Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Beyond the TEA Party time to Tell the Media we're not going to take it anymore

Are you Mad as Hell with the Lame Stream Media? Are you not going to take it anymore? Are you ready to protest the Media Malpractice taking place in America?



Time to stand up! Time to fight back on Media Malpractice. Time to tell the media no more State Run Media, no more Lame Stream Media. Time's up!


Media Malpractice March:
January 16th ABC Media Malpractice Protest
January 23rd NBC Media Malpractice Protest
January 30th CNN Media Malpractice Protest
February 6th CBS Media Malpractice Protest

Find the local news station in your area and go there at Noon each Saturday. Film it, post pictures here. Tell your friends. Grab your kids. Make the news, report the news, broadcast the news. We're not going to take it anymore America!

The American People are coming, and we are starting with you Media.

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Kay Hagan Votes No to Stop Medicare Cuts

Once more Hagan chooses a vote in favor of her Party, the Democrats rather than in favor of Senior citizens in North Carolina.

The 58-42 roll call Thursday by which the Senate rejected an amendment that would have stripped more than $400 billion in Medicare cuts from the health care bill.

A "yes" vote is a vote to adopt the amendment.

Kay Hagan is in favor of the Government Run Health Care option and apparently has no issue with cutting Medicare payments by more than 400 billion dollars, a move that will seriously affect Seniors in North Carolina.

The measure to remove the Medicare Cuts failed. The following list are the final Roll Call Votes.

ALABAMA

Sessions (R), Yes; Shelby (R), Yes.

ALASKA

Begich (D), No; Murkowski (R), Yes.

ARIZONA

Kyl (R), Yes; McCain (R), Yes.

ARKANSAS

Lincoln (D), No; Pryor (D), No.

CALIFORNIA

Boxer (D), No; Feinstein (D), No.

COLORADO

Bennet (D), No; Udall (D), No.

CONNECTICUT

Dodd (D), No; Lieberman (I), No.

DELAWARE

Carper (D), No; Kaufman (D), No.

FLORIDA

LeMieux (R), Yes; Nelson (D), No.

GEORGIA

Chambliss (R), Yes; Isakson (R), Yes.

HAWAII

Akaka (D), No; Inouye (D), No.

IDAHO

Crapo (R), Yes; Risch (R), Yes.

ILLINOIS

Burris (D), No; Durbin (D), No.

INDIANA

Bayh (D), No; Lugar (R), Yes.

IOWA

Grassley (R), Yes; Harkin (D), No.

KANSAS

Brownback (R), Yes; Roberts (R), Yes.

KENTUCKY

Bunning (R), Yes; McConnell (R), Yes.

LOUISIANA

Landrieu (D), No; Vitter (R), Yes.

MAINE

Collins (R), Yes; Snowe (R), Yes.

MARYLAND

Cardin (D), No; Mikulski (D), No.

MASSACHUSETTS

Kerry (D), No; Kirk (D), No.

MICHIGAN

Levin (D), No; Stabenow (D), No.

MINNESOTA

Franken (D), No; Klobuchar (D), No.

MISSISSIPPI

Cochran (R), Yes; Wicker (R), Yes.

MISSOURI

Bond (R), Yes; McCaskill (D), No.

MONTANA

Baucus (D), No; Tester (D), No.

NEBRASKA

Johanns (R), Yes; Nelson (D), Yes.

NEVADA

Ensign (R), Yes; Reid (D), No.

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gregg (R), Yes; Shaheen (D), No.

NEW JERSEY

Lautenberg (D), No; Menendez (D), No.

NEW MEXICO

Bingaman (D), No; Udall (D), No.

NEW YORK

Gillibrand (D), No; Schumer (D), No.

NORTH CAROLINA

Burr (R), Yes; Hagan (D), No.

NORTH DAKOTA

Conrad (D), No; Dorgan (D), No.

OHIO

Brown (D), No; Voinovich (R), Yes.

OKLAHOMA

Coburn (R), Yes; Inhofe (R), Yes.

OREGON

Merkley (D), No; Wyden (D), No.

PENNSYLVANIA

Casey (D), No; Specter (D), No.

RHODE ISLAND

Reed (D), No; Whitehouse (D), No.

SOUTH CAROLINA

DeMint (R), Yes; Graham (R), Yes.

SOUTH DAKOTA

Johnson (D), No; Thune (R), Yes.

TENNESSEE

Alexander (R), Yes; Corker (R), Yes.

TEXAS

Cornyn (R), Yes; Hutchison (R), Yes.

UTAH

Bennett (R), Yes; Hatch (R), Yes.

VERMONT

Leahy (D), No; Sanders (I), No.

VIRGINIA

Warner (D), No; Webb (D), Yes.

WASHINGTON

Cantwell (D), No; Murray (D), No.

WEST VIRGINIA

Byrd (D), No; Rockefeller (D), No.

WISCONSIN

Feingold (D), No; Kohl (D), No.

WYOMING

Barrasso (R), Yes; Enzi (R), Yes.



Friday, December 4, 2009

Support the Seals



Stop the madness, Support the Seals
www.supporttheseals.com

Our Military Leaders have either lost their minds or the Administration is pulling the puppet strings. This action continues to demonstrate the serious lack of leadership from all sources within our government. It doesn't matter if you are Democrat or Republican, Conservative or Liberal the men and women who choose to serve and protect our country must be treated fairly. This is not justice, this is not fairness, this is a travesty.

Please take a moment to send a note, email or make a call to your Representatives and Senators demanding they take action against this miscarriage of justice. Do it today December 7th is the Court Martial hearing.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

TOP 10 OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS’ TRILLION-DOLLAR ‘STIMULUS’

WRONG FROM THE START: TOP 10 OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS’ TRILLION-DOLLAR ‘STIMULUS’

WASHINGTON DEMS HEAD INTO TOMORROW’S “JOBS SUMMIT” WITH A SERIOUS CREDIBILITY PROBLEM
December 2, 2009 | House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) | Permalink

The White House will convene a “jobs summit” tomorrow against a backdrop of rising unemployment, soaring debt, and declining public confidence in the Obama Administration’s economic program. Washington Democrats staked their credibility on a nearly trillion-dollar ‘stimulus’ that was supposed to be about putting people back to work, but has instead produced countless examples of wasteful government spending while more than three million Americans have lost their jobs. Even the accounting methods designed to keep track of ‘stimulus’ dollars have been widely discredited. Given the last 11 months of outrageous ‘stimulus’ claims, the American people are right to wonder whether Washington Democrats can be trusted to create jobs and cut the deficit:

1. UNEMPLOYMENT "AT EIGHT PERCENT OR BELOW"


CLAIM: Just 10 days before taking office, Obama’s top economic advisers [Christina Romer & Jared Bernstein] released a report predicting unemployment would remain at eight percent or below through this year if an economic stimulus plan won congressional approval.” (Associated Press, 6/14/09)

FACT: The nation’s unemployment rate now stands at 10.2 percent. The President and several members of his economic team explicitly stated that the ‘stimulus’ was needed to avert double-digit unemployment.


2.
IMPACT FELT "IMMEDIATELY"

CLAIM: “Q: If the president gets his way and gets this package approved, he signs it into law, how soon before -- the American public starts to feel results, the creation of jobs? NATIONAL ECONOMIC COUNCIL DIRECTOR LAWRENCE SUMMERS: You’ll see the effects begin almost immediately.” (CNN, 2/9/09)

FACT: The U.S. economy has lost more than three million jobs since the trillion-dollar ‘stimulus’ became law. One House Democrat this week referred to the ‘stimulus’ as the “jobless American Recovery Act.” A recent survey found that fewer than one in ten Americans believe the ‘stimulus’ has helped create jobs.

3. "90 PERCENT ... PRIVATE SECTOR"

CLAIM: “More than 90 percent of the jobs created by this plan will be in the private sector.” –President Obama (News conference, 2/9/09)

FACT: “Although President Obama initially said that 90 percent of the jobs created by the stimulus program would be in the private sector, the data suggests that well over half of the jobs claimed so far have been in the public sector.” (The New York Times, 11/4/09)

4. "NO EARMARKS OR PET PROJECTS"

CLAIM: “There will be no earmarks or pet projects in this bill.” –House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (Floor statement, 2/13/09)

FACT: The trillion-dollar ‘stimulus’ has produced countless examples of wasteful government spending, including repairs to a bridge that reportedly carries about 260 cars per day, many to a place called Rusty’s Backwater Saloon in Wisconsin, and in North Carolina, where ‘stimulus’ funds were reportedly used by one town to hire a new worker whose job is to apply for more ‘stimulus’ funds from Washington.

5. "A VERY FISCALLY SOUND PACKAGE"

CLAIM: “We must make sure the public understands this is a very fiscally sound package.” –Speaker Nancy Pelosi (
Talk Radio News Service, 3/10/09)

FACT: With the help of the trillion-dollar ‘stimulus,’ the Obama Administration spent more in its first 100 days than all previous presidents have combined. The national debt has topped $12 trillion for the first time in U.S. history. The federal government is now operating on a budget that doubles the national debt in five years and triples it in ten.

6. "A LOT MORE JOBS CREATED"

CLAIM: “The second hundred days you’re going to see a lot more jobs created.” –Vice President Joe Biden (ABC’s This Week, 7/5/09)

FACT: The U.S. economy lost roughly 930,000 jobs in June, July, and August. It was during this period that the President proclaimed he could “see a light at the end of the tunnel.”

7. "A LOT MORE AMMUNITION LEFT"

CLAIM: “There is a lot more ammunition left in the stimulus package.” –Jared Bernstein, the Vice President's chief economist (CNNMoney.com, 10/30/09)

FACT: “The government’s economic stimulus spending has already had its biggest impact and probably won’t contribute to significant growth next year, a top White House adviser said Thursday.” (Associated Press, 10/22/09) “An interesting tidbit from Dr. Christina Romer’s testimony before the Joint Economic Committee. Citing economic analysts she says the fiscal stimulus will have its greatest impact on growth in the second and third quarters of 2009. (Editor’s note – those quarters are now behind us).” (ABC News, 10/22/09)

8. MORE WORK, NOT MORE JOBS

CLAIM: “I think we got the Recovery Act right. … It may be desirable to have a given amount of work shared among more people. But that’s not as desirable as expanding the total amount of work.” –National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers (The Washington Post, 11/8/09)

FACT: The Obama Administration’s attempt to suddenly make job creation seem like a lesser goal of the trillion-dollar ‘stimulus’ flies in the face of numerous public statements made in the days before the bill was passed, including the President’s statement that creating jobs was his “bottom-line number one.”

9. RAISES SAVE JOBS

CLAIM: “If I give you a raise, it is going to save a portion of your job.” –Department of Health and Human Services spokesman (Associated Press, 11/4/09)

FACT: This is one of several attempts by the Obama Administration to define a job “saved or created” by the ‘stimulus.’ In this particular case, the AP found “more than 9,300 existing employees in more than 9,300 existing employees in hundreds of local agencies who received pay raises and benefits and whose jobs weren’t saved.” In a newly released report, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office states that “it is impossible to determine how many of the reported jobs would have existed in the absence of the stimulus package.”

10. "YOU HAVEN'T SEEN WASTEFUL SPENDING"

CLAIM: “We’ve been in business seven, eight months. You haven’t seen wasteful spending. No one has said we spent $2 million on things that didn’t exist.” –Vice President Joe Biden (The Daily Show, 11/17/09)

FACT: “Stimulus jobs reported in non-existent congressional districts. … Of all the problems found in the latest round of stimulus reporting, add another one: congressional districts that don’t exist. ABC News reported yesterday that White House officials have found 700 mistakenly credited congressional districts out of more than 130,000 stimulus grants.” (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 11/18/09) “The reports on jobs created or saved by the $787 billion economic stimulus package are ‘riddled with inaccuracies and contradictions,’ the federal watchdog overseeing the spending acknowledged Thursday.” (USA TODAY, 11/19/09)

BONUS. REPUBLICAN SOLUTIONS

CLAIM: “Vice President Biden offered an impassioned defense of the Obama administration’s policies on the economy, health care, and energy this morning… He chastised administration opponents for not offering alternatives to solve the problems of the nation.” (Philadelphia Inquirer, 11/23/09)

FACT: “House Republicans Press Obama on Job Creation. House Republicans sent a letter to President Barack Obama today, pushing the administration to seek more business tax breaks as a way to boost the number of new jobs. … Republicans say in their letter that they’re hoping to work with the White House toward a bipartisan jobs plan.” (WSJ Washington Wire, 10/7/09) The proposals contained in the October letter, some of which were presented to President Obama as early as his first week in office, were developed by House Republicans' Economic Recovery and Health Care solutions groups. Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA), who heads up the Economic Recovery Solutions Group, will discuss additional proposals to spur job creation in a speech today at the Heritage Foundation.

REPUBLICAN LEADER PRESS OFFICE
REP. JOHN BOEHNER (R-OH)
H-204, THE CAPITOL

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Definitions Liberal vs. Conservatives

Airhead America that useless Liberal Loon Online Rag with 250 regular readers decided to headline an article called Useful Definitions for Conservatives so I thought I would offer my own version of the Conservative rebuttal.

"Have you ever argued politics with a conservative counterpart and
felt as if you were speaking two different languages? Well, you were.
In order to bridge the divide, we have developed some definitions in
the hopes of making things a bit easier."

No, but I have argued with Liberal Loons who continue to ignore facts, and back up links to stomp their feet and say, "because I said so."

con-serv-a-tive

[kuhn-sur-vuh-tiv] -noun: A liberal who has not yet figured out how to think for himself/herself.

lib⋅er⋅al [lib-u-rul] noun: A Confused political ideal that assumes change is progressive, consisting of mostly people who do not work at a career or profession, have paid little, if any taxes and have no individual thought process. Anyone still considered a liberal after the age of 30 or having paid a substantial amount into taxes simply has no brains at all.

fil-i-bus-ter [fil-uh-buhs-ter] -noun:

Liberal Definition The Republican's health care plan.

Conservative Definition: A means to end the Socialist take over of the United States by Liberal Progressives, as provided by the U.S. Constitution, the document that is supposed to be the foundation for legislature and governance. Insidentally this document contains the requirements for the office of President of the United States, apparently the Liberal Barack Obama forgot to read that part, or else he just doesn't think it was very important.

def-i-cit [def-uh-sit; Brit. also di-fis-it] -noun:

Liberal Definition: The amount by which a sum of money falls short of the required amount, which only matters when a Democrat is elected to office.

Conservative Definition: The amount of money that the Democrats ignore when attempting to assme control, mandate, and/or govern any part of government or private industry when they are elected to office and spend their way into debt.

Note: It always requires a Conservative to correctly reduce the deficit after a Liberal Democrat has spent the nation into deficit and debt.

sen-ate [sen-it] -noun:

Liberal Definition: an assembly or council of citizens having the highest deliberative
functions in a government, easily manipulated by a single Senator from
Connecticut who craves power and attention.

Conservative Definition: the body of government where the Democrats cannot achieve a single final bill even when they have a majority of senate seats because they can't agree on a single thing - see diversity.

sur-plus [sur-pluhs] -noun:

Liberal Definition: A thing of the past.

Conservative Definition: An imaginary amount of excess money over the amount of money US owes to other countries. Democrats use guesstimates and future projections to create an imaginary surplus. Example: Bill Clinton

con-sti-tu-tion [kon-sti-too-shuhn, -tyoo-] -noun:

Liberal Definition: the system of fundamental principles according to which a nation,
state, corporation, or the like is governed. Used to discourage health
coverage to others, and promote guns. Frequently used as buzzword
without ever being read by person using.

Conservative Definition: the system of fundamental principles according to which a nation,
state, corporation, or the like is governed. Ignored by Democrats to take over health
coverage in order to raise taxes to create an imaginary surplus and reduce the deficit until the actual liability of medical coverage payments begin sometime in the near future (AKA Ponzi Scheme), and promote guns a right allowed under the 2nd Amendment. Not only Conservative Lawmakers understand the Constitution, but Conservative constituents have read and understand their rights under the constitution, Liberals make up their rights as needed in the current situation.

stim-u-lus [stim-yuh-luh s] -noun, plural-li:

Liberal Definition: A trip to Argentina for a visit with your mistress, which could potentially cost you your job as Governor of South Carolina.

Conservative Definition: A way for Democrats to repay all the people, businesses and special interest groups for helping them get elected. Also a means to support organizations that frequently participate in illegal activities while working for future elections, like ACORN and SEIU

di-ver-si-ty [di-vur-si-tee, dayh-] -noun-plural-ties:

Liberal Definition: The state or fact of being diverse; variety. Best adhered to by publishing ten rules and excluding everyone unwilling to abide.

Conservative Definition: Democrats allowing all beliefs under their party tent in order to get elected, then once elected not being able to agree on any single item and not being able to get a single issue resolved.

gov-ern-ment [guhv-ern-muhnt, -er-muhnt] -noun:

Liberal Definition: something
evil and ineffective that needs to be limited to giving tax breaks for
the rich, subsidies for powerful interests, and wars fought by the
middle and lower-classes.

Conservative Definition: A body of people elected OF the People, BY the People and FOR the People allowed only the rights assigned to it under the Constitution and held accountable when it fails to accomplish minimum requirements while not stepping over it allowed rights.

hy-poc-ri-sy [hi-pok-ruh-see] -

Liberal Definition: no results found

Conservative Definition: a Liberal

Monday, November 30, 2009

Holiday Giving Back Remember the Troops with the USO



This hasn't been a great year for me, after 28 years of my work I've never had an issue finding my next gig. Guess what, no gigs. In my state the unemployment rate topped the national average of 10.2% a few months ago and now sits at over 11%. I'm surviving on Emergency Funds, because I've been responsible. I bought a house I could afford, I paid down my debt even if it meant eating beans and rice, and rice and beans, I've saved some money. My emergency funds are just that, I'm am having an emergency. No job, no work. I'm not going to be able to go visit my kids, my sister or my parents this year for Thanksgiving or Christmas (yes sorry for not being Politically Correct but I believe in Christ so I say CHRISTmas).

Needless to say the liberal loons and the irresponsible congress, and oh yes the rather out-in-space POTUS... get to hear the brunt of my latest project... telling them off in blogosphere, but enough about me... so how's that hope and change workin' for you?

I usually give to the troops at this time of year through the USO. I usually send a $100 at Thanksgiving and $150 at Christmas to the USO for the holiday meals, or phone calls home or any of the great things that the USO provides for the people fighting for America, but it's going to be hard to do that when I've cut back on even my grand children's presents. Then I heard today that Obama was still deciding whether to support the troops with more boots on the ground, after what 90 days. He couldn't very well make a decision today while hosting the 15th large party since his inauguration; the State dinner complete with heated tent and 7 course meal for 400 of his closest friends (mostly Lame Stream Media Press and Hollywood types). Barack Hussien Obama, mmm mmm mmm had to wait until after Thanksgiving to give some tired battered troops some support, some morale and some back up. So I asked my kids, my sister and parents and if I could take $5 from everyone's budget and send it to the USO this year. They all understood, I guess because we all understand sacrifice, unlike Congress and President Barack Hussien Obama.

Please give a few dollars to the USO to support the troops, they sure aren't getting it from congress or the president. http://www.uso.com/ LINK



The patch says 'Doing the work of' The flags are France, Germany and Russia.


Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Kay Hagan looking for money

On the day before a key Senate vote on health reform U.S. Senator Kay Hagan sent an e-mail to the Democratic Party faithfuls asking for cash. The message with a subject line "Yikes" began, "Imagine a battalion of right-wingers, T.E.A. Partiers and ultra-conservatives being elected and descending on Washington in January 2011." Sent through the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, it urged readers to donate $5 or more to the committee.
In the message Hagan recalled her own challenges in last years election: "I know first hand what it is like when the extreme right comes after you with vicious attacks." Hagan wrote. "I have seen the way they make up lies to suit their agenda, having no qualms about sullying a person's good name with deceitful tactics."
The Democratic Committee contributed millions to Hagan's effort last year to defeat Republican Incumbent Elizabeth Dole.

Quoting News and Observer Tuesday November 24th 2009.

Looks like the Democratic Committee is hurting seriously for contributions when a Jr. Senator has to beg for donations 5 years before her election campaign. Either that or given the timing Kay Hagan was looking for her bribe, like Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu (D)who received 300 million in Medicaid for her state, in return for her yes vote. Here's a hint Kay... next time try not to be so obviously in the hip pocket of the majority if your looking for a bribe for your vote.

Kay Hagan voted yes for Cloture to begin the debate on the 2074 page Health reform bill, and most likely will not have any problem voting for the unconstitutional bill that will cost senior citizens half a billion dollars in benefits and raise the premiums for everyone in the country, as well as adding 19 new taxes to an already strapped North Carolina with an 11% unemployment rate.

But, hey I'm sure that e-mail brought in at least a hundred bucks for the Democratic Committee, I could wrong though.